Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:26
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Is the 4B movement's aggressiveness against men for seeing women as mantelpieces valid?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Nutritionists Rank The Best (And Worst) Packaged Deli Meats For Your Health - HuffPost
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
How an unnoticed pregnancy complication almost ended a young Staten Island mom’s life - SILive.com
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
U.S. economy stalled in May, Fed survey finds - MarketWatch
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
John Harbaugh on Aaron Rodgers: I don’t have a reaction, just respect - NBC Sports
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What is the cost of living in Sweden as a family?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.